Malkin Estate (Re)
The executor's persistent failure to provide formal accounts after repeated formal demands since March 2023, combined with a perceived conflict of interest arising from unreported capital gains, voluntary disclosure and a CRA reassessment that threatens estate assets and will make remuneration contentious, rendered his continued appointment contrary to the beneficiaries' welfare; removal and substitution were necessary and appropriate, and immediate passing of accounts with a Registrar reference was ordered under statutory and inherent jurisdiction.
- Citation
- 2025 BCSC 1357
- Parties
- Applicant/beneficiary: James (Hamish) Malkin; Applicant/beneficiary: Peter Malkin; Applicant/beneficiary: William (Bill) Malkin; Respondent/executor and Trustee (removed): Andrew Jukes; Deceased: Margaret Leslie Malkin; Beneficiary (supportive): David Malkin
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Probate (estate Administration) / Removal Application and Hearing in Chambers Resulting in Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: respondent removed as executor/trustee; applicants' proposed substitutes appointed; respondent ordered to pass accounts and accounts referred to Registrar; costs awarded to applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Executor, Accounting by Trustee, Conflict of Interest, Trustee Remuneration, Reference to Registrar
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James (Hamish) Malkin
Applicant/beneficiary
Peter Malkin
Applicant/beneficiary
William (Bill) Malkin
Applicant/beneficiary
Andrew Jukes
Respondent/executor and Trustee (removed)
Margaret Leslie Malkin
Deceased
David Malkin
Beneficiary (supportive)
Procedural Posture
Probate (estate Administration) / Removal Application and Hearing in Chambers Resulting in Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the executor should be removed for failure to account
- 2 Whether a conflict of interest arising from alleged tax errors and a CRA reassessment warrants removal
- 3 Whether the continued appointment would impede proper administration of the estate and affect remuneration determination
Ratio Decidendi
The executor's persistent failure to provide formal accounts after repeated formal demands since March 2023, combined with a perceived conflict of interest arising from unreported capital gains, voluntary disclosure and a CRA reassessment that threatens estate assets and will make remuneration contentious, rendered his continued appointment contrary to the beneficiaries' welfare; removal and substitution were necessary and appropriate, and immediate passing of accounts with a Registrar reference was ordered under statutory and inherent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: respondent removed as executor/trustee; applicants' proposed substitutes appointed; respondent ordered to pass accounts and accounts referred to Registrar; costs awarded to applicants.
Orders
- Respondent Andrew Jukes is removed as executor of the will and trustee of the estate.
- Hamish (James (Hamish) Malkin) and William (Bill) Malkin are appointed as executors and trustees in substitution for Andrew Jukes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment