Boostani v. Cap Reit LLP

Boostani v. Cap Reit LLP

The combined balcony nuisance and pervasive mouse infestation rendered the apartment substantially less desirable than promised, warranting a partial rent abatement; a 35% abatement of rent paid ($4,100) was appropriate (amount $1,435); the hotel expense was not reimbursed; the abatement is offset against the uncashed July rent of $1,025, yielding $410 payable to the tenant.

Citation
2013 NSSM 30
Parties
Tenant (appellant): Amirnader Boostani; Landlord (respondent): CAP REIT LLP
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Director of Residential Tenancies to Small Claims Court / Decision on Appeal (hearing Held August 6, 2013; Decision Rendered August 12, 2013)
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; Director's order varied to grant tenant a rent abatement and a net payment to tenant; hotel expense claim denied.
Legal Topics
Rent Abatement, Habitability, Pest Infestation, Balcony Nuisance, Offset for Unpaid Rent, Damages/compensation, Hotel Expense Claim
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amirnader Boostani

Tenant (appellant)

CAP REIT LLP

Landlord (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Director of Residential Tenancies to Small Claims Court / Decision on Appeal (hearing Held August 6, 2013; Decision Rendered August 12, 2013)

  1. 1 Whether the tenant is entitled to a rent abatement for balcony nuisances and a mouse infestation
  2. 2 Appropriate quantum of any rent abatement
  3. 3 Whether the tenant is entitled to reimbursement for hotel expenses

Ratio Decidendi

The combined balcony nuisance and pervasive mouse infestation rendered the apartment substantially less desirable than promised, warranting a partial rent abatement; a 35% abatement of rent paid ($4,100) was appropriate (amount $1,435); the hotel expense was not reimbursed; the abatement is offset against the uncashed July rent of $1,025, yielding $410 payable to the tenant.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; Director's order varied to grant tenant a rent abatement and a net payment to tenant; hotel expense claim denied.

Orders

  • Landlord to rebate to the Tenant a rent abatement of $1,435.00 (35% of rent paid).
  • Apply an offset against the Tenant's outstanding July rent of $1,025.00, resulting in a net payment of $410.00 to the Tenant by the Landlord.