MacRae Estate (Re)
The presumption of undue influence, though triggered by the dominant mother-son relationship, was rebutted by consistent contemporaneous statements and family acknowledgement of Sadie’s intent and by evidence that Sadie knew and intended that Vincent should be eventual owner; Sadie was competent in 1995. Given Sadie’s clear intention and Vincent’s significant contributions and occupation of the farm, a resulting trust was established in favour of Vincent’s estate. Consequently the personal representative must quitclaim the estate’s interest in the St. Rose property to Vincent’s estate. The court awarded that most lease proceeds received by Vincent after joint title were properly his and...
- Citation
- 2010 NSSC 157
- Parties
- Claimant and Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent Mac Rae: Theresa MacRae; Respondents (heirs of Mary Sarah Mac Rae): Respondent Heirs; Proctor of the Estate of Mary Sarah Mac Rae: Cory Binderup; Deceased (testatrix / Estate Subject): Mary Sarah MacRae; Administrator of the Estate of Mary Sarah Mac Rae: Angus MacRae
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Estate Administration / Probate Dispute (claim Against Estate) / Judgment (final Decision on Claim)
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part: court finds resulting trust in favour of Vincent’s estate and orders estate representative to quitclaim the farm to Vincent’s estate; specified transfer of lease proceeds; costs to be briefed.
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Undue Influence Presumption and Rebuttal, Joint Tenancy and Survivorship, Intestate Succession, Estate Accounting (lease Proceeds), Tax Consequences (deemed Disposition)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Theresa MacRae
Claimant and Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent Mac Rae
Respondent Heirs
Respondents (heirs of Mary Sarah Mac Rae)
Cory Binderup
Proctor of the Estate of Mary Sarah Mac Rae
Mary Sarah MacRae
Deceased (testatrix / Estate Subject)
Angus MacRae
Administrator of the Estate of Mary Sarah Mac Rae
Procedural Posture
Estate Administration / Probate Dispute (claim Against Estate) / Judgment (final Decision on Claim)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1995 deed creating joint tenancy between Sadie and her son Vincent was procured by undue influence
- 2 Whether Sadie had testamentary/contractual capacity in 1995 to effect the deed
- 3 Whether a resulting or constructive trust arises in favour of Vincent’s estate in respect of the St. Rose property
Ratio Decidendi
The presumption of undue influence, though triggered by the dominant mother-son relationship, was rebutted by consistent contemporaneous statements and family acknowledgement of Sadie’s intent and by evidence that Sadie knew and intended that Vincent should be eventual owner; Sadie was competent in 1995. Given Sadie’s clear intention and Vincent’s significant contributions and occupation of the farm, a resulting trust was established in favour of Vincent’s estate. Consequently the personal representative must quitclaim the estate’s interest in the St. Rose property to Vincent’s estate. The court awarded that most lease proceeds received by Vincent after joint title were properly his and...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part: court finds resulting trust in favour of Vincent’s estate and orders estate representative to quitclaim the farm to Vincent’s estate; specified transfer of lease proceeds; costs to be briefed.
Orders
- Personal representative (Proctor) of Mary Sarah MacRae’s estate shall quit claim its interest in the St. Rose property to the estate of Vincent (Vinnie) MacRae.
- If the $5,124.00 cheque payable to Sadie’s estate has been cashed, $5,124.00 shall be transferred to Vincent’s estate; otherwise the cheque payable to Sadie’s estate should be payable to Vincent’s estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment