Brian Bailey and Associates v. D.M.C.
The adjudicator held the signed retainer specifying $400/hr governed the solicitor-client relationship, the work performed was necessary and reasonable, the earlier estimate was non-binding, and the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society found no professional breach; accordingly the account was taxable and the client's counterclaim dismissed.
- Citation
- 2010 NSSM 72
- Parties
- Applicant (solicitors): Brian Bailey and Associates; Respondent (client): D. M. C.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Taxation / Taxation Decision
- Outcome
- Account taxed in favour of solicitors; client's defence and counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Retainer Agreement, Reasonableness of Legal Fees, Taxation of Solicitor's Account, Client Complaints to Law Society, Delegation to Associate
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Bailey and Associates
Applicant (solicitors)
D. M. C.
Respondent (client)
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Taxation / Taxation Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the written retainer at $400/hr was binding
- 2 Whether the fees charged were reasonable and subject to reduction on taxation
- 3 Whether the solicitor failed to perform services allegedly promised
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator held the signed retainer specifying $400/hr governed the solicitor-client relationship, the work performed was necessary and reasonable, the earlier estimate was non-binding, and the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society found no professional breach; accordingly the account was taxable and the client's counterclaim dismissed.
Court Disposition
Account taxed in favour of solicitors; client's defence and counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Account taxed at $15,636.88
- Balance outstanding $5,636.88 confirmed; client's counterclaim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment