Samuels v. Steensland
The retainer, as signed with the word 'special' crossed out, must be read to exclude out‑of‑pocket medical (special) damages incurred up to settlement from the contingency percentage, while income loss (past and future) was intended by the parties to be included in the amount subject to the percentage; the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 1250
- Parties
- Solicitor: GREGORY L. SAMUELS; Client: ELLEN STEENSLAND
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Legal Profession Act Application / Hearing on Notice of Motion (may 30, 2000)
- Outcome
- Application granted to the extent of interpreting the retainer: special damages (medical expenses incurred up to settlement) are excluded from the contingency calculation; income loss is included; solicitor ordered to deliver bill; applicant awarded costs.
- Legal Topics
- Retainer Agreement Interpretation, Contingency Fees, Special Damages, Income Loss, Registrar Review, Inherent Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GREGORY L. SAMUELS
Solicitor
ELLEN STEENSLAND
Client
Procedural Posture
Legal Profession Act Application / Hearing on Notice of Motion (may 30, 2000)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the retainer entitled the solicitor to charge the agreed percentage on general and special damages including income loss
- 2 Whether deletion of the word 'special' in the retainer excluded special damages (medical expenses) from the percentage calculation
- 3 Preliminary objections on timing: failure to appeal Registrar's decision within 14 days (Rule 53(7)) and failure to seek review of account within 12 months (s.70(1) Legal Profession Act)
Ratio Decidendi
The retainer, as signed with the word 'special' crossed out, must be read to exclude out‑of‑pocket medical (special) damages incurred up to settlement from the contingency percentage, while income loss (past and future) was intended by the parties to be included in the amount subject to the percentage; the court will exercise its inherent jurisdiction to decide the issue and direct the solicitor to deliver a bill accordingly.
Court Disposition
Application granted to the extent of interpreting the retainer: special damages (medical expenses incurred up to settlement) are excluded from the contingency calculation; income loss is included; solicitor ordered to deliver bill; applicant awarded costs.
Orders
- Solicitor to deliver a bill in accordance with the Court's interpretation of the retainer (special damages incurred up to settlement exempt from percentage; income loss included)
- Applicant awarded Scale 3 costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment