PaySlate Inc. (Re)
The court approved the amended RVO because the Proposal Trustee's reports and evidentiary record demonstrated the consideration was reasonable and fair under the BIA, the SISP and follow-up efforts were adequate, the RVO preserved going concern value including tax attributes and cyber insurance, the RVO produced superior stakeholder value compared with an AVO and other offers, the proposed releases were restricted and proportionate, service was valid, and the settlement with Paysafe did not reorder priorities or reduce recoveries to other creditors, thus satisfying s.65.13(4)-(5) of the BIA and applicable authorities.
- Citation
- 2023 BCSC 977
- Parties
- Debtor/applicant: PaySlate Inc.; Respondent/creditor: Paysafe Merchant Services Inc.; Proposal Trustee: Grant Thornton Limited; Interested Party: Ayrshire Real Estate Management Inc.; Interested Party: 1410512 B.C. Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- In Bankruptcy and Insolvency; Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal / Hearing for Approval of Reverse Vesting Order, Validation of Service, Increase in DIP Financing and Extension of Stay
- Outcome
- The amended reverse vesting order is approved; service is declared valid and effected; DIP financing amount increase approved; settlement with Paysafe accepted; stay extended to May 19, 2023.
- Legal Topics
- Reverse Vesting Order, Asset Vesting Order, Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (sisp), DIP Financing, Releases and Indemnities, Sr&ed Tax Attributes, Cyber Insurance, Service of Process, Stay Extension
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PaySlate Inc.
Debtor/applicant
Paysafe Merchant Services Inc.
Respondent/creditor
Grant Thornton Limited
Proposal Trustee
Ayrshire Real Estate Management Inc.
Interested Party
1410512 B.C. Ltd.
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
In Bankruptcy and Insolvency; Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal / Hearing for Approval of Reverse Vesting Order, Validation of Service, Increase in DIP Financing and Extension of Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed reverse vesting order (RVO) is reasonable and fair under the BIA and should be approved
- 2 Whether the debtor and proposal trustee conducted adequate marketing (SISP) and whether alternatives offer better value
- 3 Whether the RVO is necessary to preserve going concern value, tax attributes (SR&ED) and cyber insurance
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the amended RVO because the Proposal Trustee's reports and evidentiary record demonstrated the consideration was reasonable and fair under the BIA, the SISP and follow-up efforts were adequate, the RVO preserved going concern value including tax attributes and cyber insurance, the RVO produced superior stakeholder value compared with an AVO and other offers, the proposed releases were restricted and proportionate, service was valid, and the settlement with Paysafe did not reorder priorities or reduce recoveries to other creditors, thus satisfying s.65.13(4)-(5) of the BIA and applicable authorities.
Court Disposition
The amended reverse vesting order is approved; service is declared valid and effected; DIP financing amount increase approved; settlement with Paysafe accepted; stay extended to May 19, 2023.
Orders
- Approve the reverse vesting order as amended and reflected in affidavit exhibit to be filed by counsel for PaySlate
- Declare service to be valid and effected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment