R. v. Taylor

R. v. Taylor

After calculating total delay (796 days), deducting 220 days attributable to Defence (explicit and implied waiver and unavailability) yielding a net delay of 576 days (18 months and 3 weeks), and then deducting five months for discrete exceptional Crown events (counsel conflict delay and judicial appointment/unavailability), the remaining delay was 13 months and 3 weeks, below the 18 month provincial Jordan ceiling; accordingly there was no s.11(b) violation and the stay was denied.

Citation
2018 NSPC 40
Parties
Respondent (crown): Her Majesty the Queen; Applicant (accused): Walter Francis Taylor
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Section 11(b) Charter Application (stay) / Mid Trial S.11(b) Application (jordan Delay Hearing)
Outcome
Application for stay of proceedings under section 11(b) dismissed; no Charter violation found
Legal Topics
Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Section 11(b) Charter, Jordan Delay Framework, Waiver and Implied Waiver, Exceptional Circumstances, Judicial Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent (crown)

Walter Francis Taylor

Applicant (accused)

Procedural Posture

Criminal Section 11(b) Charter Application (stay) / Mid Trial S.11(b) Application (jordan Delay Hearing)

  1. 1 Whether the delay violated section 11(b) Charter right to timely trial
  2. 2 Allocation of delay between Crown and Defence (explicit and implied waiver)
  3. 3 Whether Crown proved exceptional circumstances that justify remaining delay

Ratio Decidendi

After calculating total delay (796 days), deducting 220 days attributable to Defence (explicit and implied waiver and unavailability) yielding a net delay of 576 days (18 months and 3 weeks), and then deducting five months for discrete exceptional Crown events (counsel conflict delay and judicial appointment/unavailability), the remaining delay was 13 months and 3 weeks, below the 18 month provincial Jordan ceiling; accordingly there was no s.11(b) violation and the stay was denied.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of proceedings under section 11(b) dismissed; no Charter violation found

Orders

  • Application for a stay of proceedings under s.11(b) dismissed; trial to continue