R. v. Taylor
After calculating total delay (796 days), deducting 220 days attributable to Defence (explicit and implied waiver and unavailability) yielding a net delay of 576 days (18 months and 3 weeks), and then deducting five months for discrete exceptional Crown events (counsel conflict delay and judicial appointment/unavailability), the remaining delay was 13 months and 3 weeks, below the 18 month provincial Jordan ceiling; accordingly there was no s.11(b) violation and the stay was denied.
- Citation
- 2018 NSPC 40
- Parties
- Respondent (crown): Her Majesty the Queen; Applicant (accused): Walter Francis Taylor
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Section 11(b) Charter Application (stay) / Mid Trial S.11(b) Application (jordan Delay Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings under section 11(b) dismissed; no Charter violation found
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Section 11(b) Charter, Jordan Delay Framework, Waiver and Implied Waiver, Exceptional Circumstances, Judicial Delay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent (crown)
Walter Francis Taylor
Applicant (accused)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Section 11(b) Charter Application (stay) / Mid Trial S.11(b) Application (jordan Delay Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay violated section 11(b) Charter right to timely trial
- 2 Allocation of delay between Crown and Defence (explicit and implied waiver)
- 3 Whether Crown proved exceptional circumstances that justify remaining delay
Ratio Decidendi
After calculating total delay (796 days), deducting 220 days attributable to Defence (explicit and implied waiver and unavailability) yielding a net delay of 576 days (18 months and 3 weeks), and then deducting five months for discrete exceptional Crown events (counsel conflict delay and judicial appointment/unavailability), the remaining delay was 13 months and 3 weeks, below the 18 month provincial Jordan ceiling; accordingly there was no s.11(b) violation and the stay was denied.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings under section 11(b) dismissed; no Charter violation found
Orders
- Application for a stay of proceedings under s.11(b) dismissed; trial to continue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment