R. v. Langille-Buell

R. v. Langille-Buell

The court acquitted on the robbery charge because the Crown failed to prove the theft element beyond a reasonable doubt; credible impartial bystander testimony and doubts about the complainant’s account supported a finding that the accused honestly believed he had a property interest in the bagged items, negating the required fraudulent intent for theft.

Citation
2011 NSPC 109
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Jonathan Lloyd Langille-Buell
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery (indictable) / Trial (verdict on Robbery Charge)
Outcome
Accused acquitted of robbery (s.344(b) CC). Guilty pleas on related counts noted: assault causing bodily harm (s.267(b)) and breach of recognizance (s.145(3)).
Legal Topics
Robbery, Theft, Fraudulent Intent, Mens Rea, Witness Credibility
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Evidence Property Offences Robbery Theft Fraudulent Intent Mens Rea Witness Credibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

Jonathan Lloyd Langille-Buell

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Robbery (indictable) / Trial (verdict on Robbery Charge)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the element of stealing/theft was proven beyond a reasonable doubt for robbery under s.344(b) CC
  2. 2 Whether the accused had a bona fide ownership or property interest in the items taken
  3. 3 Evaluation of witness credibility and the weight of an impartial bystander's testimony

Ratio Decidendi

The court acquitted on the robbery charge because the Crown failed to prove the theft element beyond a reasonable doubt; credible impartial bystander testimony and doubts about the complainant’s account supported a finding that the accused honestly believed he had a property interest in the bagged items, negating the required fraudulent intent for theft.

Court Disposition

Accused acquitted of robbery (s.344(b) CC). Guilty pleas on related counts noted: assault causing bodily harm (s.267(b)) and breach of recognizance (s.145(3)).

Orders

  • Accused Jonathan Lloyd Langille-Buell is acquitted of the robbery charge contrary to s.344(b) of the Criminal Code.
  • Convictions recorded for assault causing bodily harm (s.267(b) CC) and breach of recognizance (s.145(3) CC) as pleaded.