R. v. Bradley
A five‑year custodial sentence is fit for the offence of break‑in and robbery involving disguise and violence; given the accused's significant criminal record, the need for denunciation and deterrence, and the totality principle together with some credit for the accused's stated desire to reform, the sentence is to be served concurrently with the existing sentence.
- Citation
- 2014 BCSC 713
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Justin Lee Bradley
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted (pleaded guilty) and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Break and Enter, Sentencing, Concurrent Sentences, Totality Principle, Weapons Prohibition, DNA Order
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Justin Lee Bradley
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing (oral Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate length of sentence for robbery with violence and disguise
- 2 Whether sentence should be concurrent or consecutive with prior sentence
- 3 Application of totality principle
Ratio Decidendi
A five‑year custodial sentence is fit for the offence of break‑in and robbery involving disguise and violence; given the accused's significant criminal record, the need for denunciation and deterrence, and the totality principle together with some credit for the accused's stated desire to reform, the sentence is to be served concurrently with the existing sentence.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted (pleaded guilty) and sentenced
Orders
- Five years' imprisonment to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed on January 14, 2013
- Stay of proceedings on the balance of the counts
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment