R. v. Wilson-Hives
The court accepted the joint submission because it found the proposed sentence complied with sentencing principles and would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute, and imposed consecutive sentences of 30 days for robbery and the mandatory one-year term for using an imitation firearm (total 13 months), followed by 12 months probation and ancillary orders including firearm prohibition and DNA sample.
- Citation
- 2020 BCSC 1488
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Dallas Wilson-Hives
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Robbery and Use of an Imitation Firearm / Sentencing (oral Reasons)
- Outcome
- Accused pleaded guilty to Counts 3 and 4; Counts 1 and 2 stayed; sentence imposed as jointly recommended.
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Imitation Firearm, Mandatory Minimum Sentence, Probation Conditions, DNA Order, Firearm Prohibition, Stay of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Dallas Wilson-Hives
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery and Use of an Imitation Firearm / Sentencing (oral Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the joint submission on sentence is appropriate and conforms to sentencing principles
- 2 Application of mandatory minimum imprisonment for using an imitation firearm during a robbery
- 3 Whether sentences should be consecutive or concurrent
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the joint submission because it found the proposed sentence complied with sentencing principles and would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute, and imposed consecutive sentences of 30 days for robbery and the mandatory one-year term for using an imitation firearm (total 13 months), followed by 12 months probation and ancillary orders including firearm prohibition and DNA sample.
Court Disposition
Accused pleaded guilty to Counts 3 and 4; Counts 1 and 2 stayed; sentence imposed as jointly recommended.
Orders
- Sentence on Count 3 (robbery): 30 days imprisonment
- Sentence on Count 4 (use of an imitation firearm): mandatory minimum one year imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment