R. v. O'Brien
Given the offender's significant role in planning and encouraging the robbery, extensive prior convictions, the violent character and impact of the offence, and limited prospects for rehabilitation, a custodial sentence of two years consecutive to the current sentence was necessary to denounce the conduct, deter others and protect the community.
- Citation
- 2006 NSSC 153
- Parties
- Crown/prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused/defendant: Marty David O’Brien
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Robbery (counselling) / Sentencing Hearing/decision
- Outcome
- Two years imprisonment to be served consecutive to the current sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Counselling to Commit Offence, Sentencing Principles, General Deterrence, Denunciation, Consecutive Sentences, Community Impact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown/prosecution
Marty David O’Brien
Accused/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery (counselling) / Sentencing Hearing/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for counselling a robbery
- 2 Application of s.718 sentencing principles (denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation)
- 3 Whether sentence should be consecutive to current custody
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's significant role in planning and encouraging the robbery, extensive prior convictions, the violent character and impact of the offence, and limited prospects for rehabilitation, a custodial sentence of two years consecutive to the current sentence was necessary to denounce the conduct, deter others and protect the community.
Court Disposition
Two years imprisonment to be served consecutive to the current sentence.
Orders
- Two years imprisonment, to be served consecutive to the 51 month sentence the offender is currently serving.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment