R. v. Edrissi

R. v. Edrissi

Applicant failed to meet the heavy evidentiary burden for a Rowbotham stay: financial disclosure was incomplete and showed available funds and equity he did not attempt to monetize; the case was not of extraordinary complexity such that lack of counsel would produce a miscarriage of justice; therefore the conditional stay was denied.

Citation
2013 BCSC 1287
Parties
Crown/respondent: Regina; Applicant/accused: Freidown Edrissi
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
5 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Fraud (s.380(1)(a) Criminal Code) / Pre Trial Notice Application for a Rowbotham Stay (application to Stay Proceedings Until Government Funds Counsel)
Outcome
Application dismissed; Rowbotham stay denied.
Legal Topics
Rowbotham Application, Stay of Proceedings, Right to Counsel, Indigency Assessment, Jury Trial Election
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Charter Law Access to Justice/legal Aid Procedural Law Rowbotham Application Stay of Proceedings Right to Counsel Indigency Assessment +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown/respondent

Freidown Edrissi

Applicant/accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Fraud (s.380(1)(a) Criminal Code) / Pre Trial Notice Application for a Rowbotham Stay (application to Stay Proceedings Until Government Funds Counsel)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused is indigent for Rowbotham purposes
  2. 2 Whether the accused has discharged the evidentiary burden to justify a stay until publicly funded counsel is provided
  3. 3 Whether the charge and circumstances are so complex or serious that trial without counsel would cause a miscarriage of justice

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to meet the heavy evidentiary burden for a Rowbotham stay: financial disclosure was incomplete and showed available funds and equity he did not attempt to monetize; the case was not of extraordinary complexity such that lack of counsel would produce a miscarriage of justice; therefore the conditional stay was denied.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; Rowbotham stay denied.

Orders

  • Application for stay of proceedings dismissed.
  • No stay ordered; proceedings to continue without government-funded counsel.