Bradshaw v. Minister of Customs & Excise
The phrase 'nursery stock' in subs. 4 of s.19BBB does not include cut flowers or the potted plants sold by the appellant because 'nursery' denotes a place and stock intended for cultivation to a stage suitable for transplantation or similar purposes; the ordinary meaning, supported by the French 'pépinière' and tariff usage, excludes cut flowers and the potted plants at issue, so the sales are taxable.
- Citation
- [1928] SCR 54
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Arthur Bradshaw; Respondent / Plaintiff: Minister of Customs and Excise
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 1927
- Procedural Posture
- Taxation Sales Tax / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal of British Columbia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of Appeal of British Columbia affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax, Exemption for Nursery Stock, Interpretation of Statutory Exemptions, Bilingual Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur Bradshaw
Appellant / Defendant
Minister of Customs and Excise
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Taxation Sales Tax / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal of British Columbia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cut flowers fall within the statutory phrase 'nursery stock' in s.19BBB of the Special War Revenue Act, 1915
- 2 Whether potted plants sold by a florist fall within 'nursery stock' and are therefore exempt from the sales tax
- 3 Whether the statutory language should be construed in light of the French version and prior tariff terminology
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'nursery stock' in subs. 4 of s.19BBB does not include cut flowers or the potted plants sold by the appellant because 'nursery' denotes a place and stock intended for cultivation to a stage suitable for transplantation or similar purposes; the ordinary meaning, supported by the French 'pépinière' and tariff usage, excludes cut flowers and the potted plants at issue, so the sales are taxable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of Appeal of British Columbia affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment