The King v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. / Palmolive Manufacturing Co. (Ontario) Ltd. v. The King
The companies, though separate legal entities, functioned in substance as a single enterprise for production and sale of Palmolive goods; the Ontario manufacturing company was the agent/department of the selling company and therefore Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. is liable for the sales tax based on the prices it obtained from the public (less amounts already paid by the manufacturing company), with specified interest and penalties; the tax is to be imposed on the real price to the consumer rather than on intercompany transfer prices.
- Citation
- [1933] SCR 131
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: The Palmolive Manufacturing Company (Ontario) Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: His Majesty The King on the Information of The Attorney General of Canada; Defendant/respondent: Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company, Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 February 1933
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada (recovery of Sales Tax) / Final Disposition on Appeal and Cross Appeal; Case Remitted to Exchequer Court for Entry of Judgment Against Colgate Palmolive Peet Co. Ltd.
- Outcome
- Appeal of The Palmolive Manufacturing Company (Ontario) Limited allowed and action dismissed against it without costs; cross-appeal of His Majesty against Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. allowed; case remitted to Exchequer Court to enter judgment against Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. for sales tax based on prices...
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax, Consumption Tax, Corporate Veil Piercing, Agency, Related Party Transactions, Tax Avoidance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Palmolive Manufacturing Company (Ontario) Limited
Defendant/appellant
His Majesty The King on the Information of The Attorney General of Canada
Plaintiff/respondent
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company, Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada (recovery of Sales Tax) / Final Disposition on Appeal and Cross Appeal; Case Remitted to Exchequer Court for Entry of Judgment Against Colgate Palmolive Peet Co. Ltd.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sales tax under s.19BBB(1) is to be calculated on the price charged by the manufacturing subsidiary or on the price received by the selling company from the public
- 2 Whether two separate corporations under common control should be treated as one producer or agent of the other for taxation purposes (piercing corporate form)
- 3 Whether the intercompany transactions were fictitious and intended to avoid tax
Ratio Decidendi
The companies, though separate legal entities, functioned in substance as a single enterprise for production and sale of Palmolive goods; the Ontario manufacturing company was the agent/department of the selling company and therefore Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. is liable for the sales tax based on the prices it obtained from the public (less amounts already paid by the manufacturing company), with specified interest and penalties; the tax is to be imposed on the real price to the consumer rather than on intercompany transfer prices.
Court Disposition
Appeal of The Palmolive Manufacturing Company (Ontario) Limited allowed and action dismissed against it without costs; cross-appeal of His Majesty against Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. allowed; case remitted to Exchequer Court to enter judgment against Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd. for sales tax based on prices...
Orders
- Allow appeal of The Palmolive Manufacturing Company (Ontario) Limited; dismiss action against it without costs.
- Allow cross-appeal of His Majesty the King against Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd.; remit to Exchequer Court to enter judgment for sales tax at the rates from time to time applicable based on prices obtained by Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. Ltd., less amounts already paid by The Palmolive Manufacturing Company...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment