R. v. B.P.
The court accepted the joint recommendation and found the statutory criteria for an IRCS under s.42(7) YCJA satisfied; imposed the maximum youth sentence of seven years as an IRCS under s.42(2)(r) (custodial portion up to four years followed by supervised community placement) and credited 39 days remand against the custodial portion.
- Citation
- 2015 NSPC 38
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused/young Person: B.P.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Youth Criminal Second Degree Murder / Sentencing Decision
- Outcome
- Guilty plea accepted; sentenced to a seven-year youth sentence under the YCJA as an IRCS order.
- Legal Topics
- Second Degree Murder, IRCS (intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision), Juvenile Sentencing, Remand Credit, Psychological Assessment and Rehabilitation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
B.P.
Accused/young Person
Procedural Posture
Youth Criminal Second Degree Murder / Sentencing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Eligibility for IRCS under the YCJA
- 2 Appropriate youth sentence and length
- 3 Application of presumption of diminished moral blameworthiness for youth
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the joint recommendation and found the statutory criteria for an IRCS under s.42(7) YCJA satisfied; imposed the maximum youth sentence of seven years as an IRCS under s.42(2)(r) (custodial portion up to four years followed by supervised community placement) and credited 39 days remand against the custodial portion.
Court Disposition
Guilty plea accepted; sentenced to a seven-year youth sentence under the YCJA as an IRCS order.
Orders
- Impose an IRCS sentence under YCJA s.42(2)(r) for a total term of seven years.
- Custodial portion of the IRCS sentence not to exceed four years, reduced by 39 days credit for remand (credit applied against the custodial portion).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment