R. v. Osguthorpe
The accused expressly and unequivocally waived his implementation right by stating 'I waive my rights to the Sidney robbery' with appreciation of the consequences; therefore s.10(b) rights were not infringed and the subsequent statements are admissible.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2004 BCSC 1641
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Christopher Colin Osguthorpe
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Charter Application / Oral Ruling on Charter Application
- Outcome
- Charter application dismissed; accused's s.10(b) rights found not infringed
- Legal Topics
- Section 10(b) Right to Counsel, Waiver of Rights, Admissibility of Statements, Police Implementation Duty (whittle)
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Christopher Colin Osguthorpe
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Charter Application / Oral Ruling on Charter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.10(b) right to counsel was infringed
- 2 Whether the accused validly and unequivocally waived his s.10(b) right to counsel
- 3 Whether the statements made while in custody are admissible
Ratio Decidendi
The accused expressly and unequivocally waived his implementation right by stating 'I waive my rights to the Sidney robbery' with appreciation of the consequences; therefore s.10(b) rights were not infringed and the subsequent statements are admissible.
Court Disposition
Charter application dismissed; accused's s.10(b) rights found not infringed
Orders
- No exclusion of the accused's statements; statements may be admitted into evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment