R. v. Chandra
The breach was an isolated, brief event by a parent supervising his own children that placed him in a prohibited position of trust; given the mitigating factors including guilty plea, modest means and low likelihood of recurrence, a fine within the joint proposed range is fit—court imposed a $400 fine payable in three months as it meets sentencing purposes.
- Citation
- 2013 BCSC 792
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Anil Chandra
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted on guilty plea for breach of s.161 prohibition order and sentenced to a fine of $400
- Legal Topics
- Section 161 Criminal Code, Prohibition Order, Breach of Prohibition Order, Fines, Mitigation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Anil Chandra
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused breached a s.161 prohibition order
- 2 Appropriate sentence for breach of a s.161 order
- 3 Weight to give guilty plea and personal/financial mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The breach was an isolated, brief event by a parent supervising his own children that placed him in a prohibited position of trust; given the mitigating factors including guilty plea, modest means and low likelihood of recurrence, a fine within the joint proposed range is fit—court imposed a $400 fine payable in three months as it meets sentencing purposes.
Court Disposition
Convicted on guilty plea for breach of s.161 prohibition order and sentenced to a fine of $400
Orders
- Fine of $400 payable within three months
- Conviction recorded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment