R. v. K.D.N.
Section 276 applies to the indictment because a charged sexual assault creates a connection to the enumerated offences and the s.276 protections extend to sex-work related evidence; exotic dancing qualifies as sexual activity for the purposes of s.276; the proposed evidence of the complainant's past/subsequent exotic dancing is not capable of being admitted at stage one because its probative aim relies on impermissible twin-myth/propensity reasoning and is not properly relevant to coercion or control in a way that overcomes s.276's protective purpose, so no stage two hearing is required.
- Citation
- 2024 NSSC 83
- Parties
- Crown: His Majesty the King; Accused: K.D.N.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Human Trafficking and Related Sexual and Assault Offences / Pre Trial S.276 (stage 1) Application Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; s.276 applies and the proposed evidence is not capable of being admitted; no second-stage hearing ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Section 276, Prior Sexual Activity, Admissibility, Consent, Coercion, Twin Myth Reasoning
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King
Crown
K.D.N.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Human Trafficking and Related Sexual and Assault Offences / Pre Trial S.276 (stage 1) Application Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.276 of the Criminal Code applies to human trafficking charges
- 2 Whether evidence of prior/subsequent exotic dancing constitutes prior sexual activity under s.276
- 3 Whether the proposed evidence is capable of being admitted at stage one of s.276 process
Ratio Decidendi
Section 276 applies to the indictment because a charged sexual assault creates a connection to the enumerated offences and the s.276 protections extend to sex-work related evidence; exotic dancing qualifies as sexual activity for the purposes of s.276; the proposed evidence of the complainant's past/subsequent exotic dancing is not capable of being admitted at stage one because its probative aim relies on impermissible twin-myth/propensity reasoning and is not properly relevant to coercion or control in a way that overcomes s.276's protective purpose, so no stage two hearing is required.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; s.276 applies and the proposed evidence is not capable of being admitted; no second-stage hearing ordered.
Orders
- Defence s.276 application denied
- No entitlement to proceed to stage two s.276 hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment