R. v. Saulnier
Section 525 hearings are de novo assessments focused primarily on whether continued detention is justified under s.515(10); the accused seeking release bears the onus to satisfy the court of changed circumstances or inadequacy of original grounds for detention; on the facts the proposed sureties and release plan were inadequate, there was no persuasive new evidence (the alibi lacked weight) and trial was imminent, therefore continued detention was justified and release was properly denied.
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 45
- Parties
- Provincial Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Accused: Douglas David Saulnier
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Section 525 Pre Trial Detention Review / Section 525 Review Hearing (pre Trial Custody Review)
- Outcome
- Application to vary bail/for release under s.525 denied; accused remains detained pending trial.
- Legal Topics
- Section 525 Review, Section 515(10) Factors, Burden of Proof on Bail Review, Surety Assessment, Trial Delay/right to Timely Trial, Record for Review Hearings, Admissibility of New Evidence at Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Provincial Crown
Douglas David Saulnier
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Section 525 Pre Trial Detention Review / Section 525 Review Hearing (pre Trial Custody Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an accused who consented to remand or who did not have an initial show cause hearing is nevertheless entitled to a s.525 review
- 2 What constitutes the 'record' for a s.525 review and who must produce it
- 3 Whether s.525 hearings are limited to review of the existing record or permit de novo consideration including new evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Section 525 hearings are de novo assessments focused primarily on whether continued detention is justified under s.515(10); the accused seeking release bears the onus to satisfy the court of changed circumstances or inadequacy of original grounds for detention; on the facts the proposed sureties and release plan were inadequate, there was no persuasive new evidence (the alibi lacked weight) and trial was imminent, therefore continued detention was justified and release was properly denied.
Court Disposition
Application to vary bail/for release under s.525 denied; accused remains detained pending trial.
Orders
- Douglas David Saulnier to remain in custody pending trial set for March 5 and 6, 2012
- No directions to expedite the trial were given
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment