R. v. Gray
The Justice of the Peace could have been satisfied on the totality of the information in the ITO — reliable confidential informants giving contemporaneous information corroborated by police database checks and other neutral facts — such that reasonable and probable grounds existed to issue the CDSA s.11 warrant; therefore the warrant was valid and the section 8 Charter application is dismissed, with no need to address s.24(2).
- Citation
- 2013 NSPC 85
- Parties
- Respondent (crown): Her Majesty the Queen; Applicant (accused): Michael George Gray
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (possession for the Purpose of Trafficking) / Charter Voir Dire Pre Trial Decision (section 8 Application)
- Outcome
- Charter application dismissed; search warrant upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Section 8 Charter, Section 24(2) Exclusion, Search Warrant (cdsa S.11), Informant Reliability, Corroboration, Reasonable Grounds, Probable Cause
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent (crown)
Michael George Gray
Applicant (accused)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (possession for the Purpose of Trafficking) / Charter Voir Dire Pre Trial Decision (section 8 Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Information to Obtain provided reasonable and probable grounds to issue a CDSA s.11 search warrant for Apartment 604, 7 Horizon Court
- 2 Whether informant information was stale or too vague to establish reasonable grounds
- 3 Whether corroboration of the criminal aspect of the tip was required
Ratio Decidendi
The Justice of the Peace could have been satisfied on the totality of the information in the ITO — reliable confidential informants giving contemporaneous information corroborated by police database checks and other neutral facts — such that reasonable and probable grounds existed to issue the CDSA s.11 warrant; therefore the warrant was valid and the section 8 Charter application is dismissed, with no need to address s.24(2).
Court Disposition
Charter application dismissed; search warrant upheld.
Orders
- Application dismissed; no order made on section 24(2) as it was unnecessary to address exclusion of evidence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment