R. v.Stubinski

R. v.Stubinski

The blanket recording of all inmate telephone conversations was not authorized by s.43 of the Correctional Act Rules and Regulations; because the Director had no particular basis to believe all calls might disclose a threat the recording was indiscriminate and unreasonable and therefore violated s.8 of the Charter.

Citation
2002 BCSC 613
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: David John Stubinski
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Charter Application / Voir Dire (pre Trial Ruling)
Outcome
Section 8 Charter right violated by manner of recording; recordings made indiscriminately and unlawfully.
Legal Topics
Section 8 Charter, Search and Seizure, Interception of Communications, Correctional Centre Regulations, Expectation of Privacy
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

David John Stubinski

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Charter Application / Voir Dire (pre Trial Ruling)

  1. 1 Whether s.8 of the Charter was violated by recording inmate telephone calls
  2. 2 Whether inmates retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls
  3. 3 Whether s.43 of the Correctional Act Rules and Regulations authorized blanket recording

Ratio Decidendi

The blanket recording of all inmate telephone conversations was not authorized by s.43 of the Correctional Act Rules and Regulations; because the Director had no particular basis to believe all calls might disclose a threat the recording was indiscriminate and unreasonable and therefore violated s.8 of the Charter.

Court Disposition

Section 8 Charter right violated by manner of recording; recordings made indiscriminately and unlawfully.