Harkat (Re)
The court confirmed Mr. Harkat’s release under section 82(5)(b) because the Ministers established a prima facie case that unconditional release would be injurious to national security, but on a proportionality assessment (considering passage of time, supervision history, credibility factors and CBSA safeguards) the court varied several conditions: permitted limited home‑alone periods subject to safeguards (no computer access, CBSA notification and hourly checks), increased weekly outings to five of six hours with 36‑hour notice, allowed expanded media and counsel access under defined notice and safeguards, permitted contact with a pre‑approved Imam but refused unsupervised contact with...
- Citation
- 2009 FC 241
- Parties
- Respondent / Certifying Authorities: Solicitor General of Canada and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration; Applicant / Named Person: Mohamed Harkat; Special Advocates: Special Advocates
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Security Certificate and Review of Conditions of Release Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Section 82(4) (5) Interim Review of Conditions Following Re Certification Under Bill C 3; Reasons for Judgment Confirming Release and Varying Conditions
- Outcome
- Release under conditions confirmed; conditions varied and clarified as set out in reasons
- Legal Topics
- Security Certificates, Judicial Review of Detention and Release Conditions, Special Advocate Procedure, Disclosure Obligations, Proportionality in Conditions of Release
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solicitor General of Canada and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Respondent / Certifying Authorities
Mohamed Harkat
Applicant / Named Person
Special Advocates
Special Advocates
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Security Certificate and Review of Conditions of Release Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Section 82(4) (5) Interim Review of Conditions Following Re Certification Under Bill C 3; Reasons for Judgment Confirming Release and Varying Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should confirm continued release under conditions
- 2 Which specific conditions are necessary and proportionate to neutralize danger to national security and risk of flight
- 3 Effect of changed legislation (Bill C-3) and Supreme Court decisions on review standard
Ratio Decidendi
The court confirmed Mr. Harkat’s release under section 82(5)(b) because the Ministers established a prima facie case that unconditional release would be injurious to national security, but on a proportionality assessment (considering passage of time, supervision history, credibility factors and CBSA safeguards) the court varied several conditions: permitted limited home‑alone periods subject to safeguards (no computer access, CBSA notification and hourly checks), increased weekly outings to five of six hours with 36‑hour notice, allowed expanded media and counsel access under defined notice and safeguards, permitted contact with a pre‑approved Imam but refused unsupervised contact with...
Court Disposition
Release under conditions confirmed; conditions varied and clarified as set out in reasons
Orders
- Mr. Harkat’s release under conditions is confirmed
- Permit Mr. Harkat to be home alone between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. subject to CBSA satisfaction that he cannot access any computer equipment, 36‑hour advance notice to CBSA by the Harkats before any home‑alone period, hourly telephone check‑ins to CBSA while unsupervised, and other existing monitoring safeguards...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment