Quon v. Johnson
The landlord failed to make the required application within ten days and the alleged defects fell within reasonable wear and tear; therefore the Director's order requiring return of the withheld security deposit was correct and must be confirmed.
- Citation
- 2007 NSSM 80
- Parties
- Landlord: Charles Quon; Tenant: David Johnson
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Appeal From Director of Residential Tenancies / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Director's order confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Security Deposit, Return of Deposit, Statutory Time Limits, Reasonable Wear and Tear, Application to Director
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Quon
Landlord
David Johnson
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Appeal From Director of Residential Tenancies / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord could retain the security deposit for cleaning and repairs
- 2 Whether the tenant's alleged damage exceeded reasonable wear and tear
- 3 Whether the landlord complied with the Residential Tenancies Act time limits for applying to retain a deposit
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord failed to make the required application within ten days and the alleged defects fell within reasonable wear and tear; therefore the Director's order requiring return of the withheld security deposit was correct and must be confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Director's order confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed and the October 30, 2007 order of the Director of Residential Tenancies confirmed
- Landlord ordered to return the balance of the security deposit of $892.38 to the Tenant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment