Credit Union Atlantic Ltd. v. Hebron Hospitality Group Inc.
The court found the moving party met the requirements of CR 45: Hebron failed to maintain an address for delivery (CR 45.02(3)(d)), had indicators of insufficient assets (revoked status at the Registry of Joint Stock and past judgments supporting CR 45.02(3)(c)), and on balance it was unfair to permit the substantial but vague $750,000 counterclaim to proceed without security; accordingly the court ordered security for costs of $20,000 to be paid into court in two $10,000 installments and stayed the counterclaim until security was provided, alternatively relying on s.152 Companies Act.
- Citation
- 2021 NSSC 40
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Credit Union Atlantic Limited; Defendant/respondent (counterclaimant): Hebron Hospitality Group Inc. (formerly 3295522 Nova Scotia Ltd., operating as Smiling Goat Organic Espresso Bar); Defendant/respondent (guarantor): 3294118 Nova Scotia Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Debt Action and Counterclaim With Motion for Security for Costs / Interim Motion Heard (security for Costs) — Decision on Motion
- Outcome
- Motion for security for costs granted against Hebron Hospitality Group Inc.; counterclaim stayed until security provided; security fixed at $20,000 to be paid into court in two installments; costs of motion awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Companies Act S.152, Service of Process, Counterclaim, Registry Status/revocation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Credit Union Atlantic Limited
Plaintiff/applicant
Hebron Hospitality Group Inc. (formerly 3295522 Nova Scotia Ltd., operating as Smiling Goat Organic Espresso Bar)
Defendant/respondent (counterclaimant)
3294118 Nova Scotia Limited
Defendant/respondent (guarantor)
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt Action and Counterclaim With Motion for Security for Costs / Interim Motion Heard (security for Costs) — Decision on Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered under Civil Procedure Rule 45
- 2 Whether the defendant Hebron Hospitality Group Inc. will have undue difficulty realizing on a costs judgment
- 3 Whether any difficulty arises only from the defendant’s lack of means
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the moving party met the requirements of CR 45: Hebron failed to maintain an address for delivery (CR 45.02(3)(d)), had indicators of insufficient assets (revoked status at the Registry of Joint Stock and past judgments supporting CR 45.02(3)(c)), and on balance it was unfair to permit the substantial but vague $750,000 counterclaim to proceed without security; accordingly the court ordered security for costs of $20,000 to be paid into court in two $10,000 installments and stayed the counterclaim until security was provided, alternatively relying on s.152 Companies Act.
Court Disposition
Motion for security for costs granted against Hebron Hospitality Group Inc.; counterclaim stayed until security provided; security fixed at $20,000 to be paid into court in two installments; costs of motion awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Hebron Hospitality Group Inc. shall pay security for costs totalling CAD 20000 into court in two installments of CAD 10000 each
- First installment of CAD 10000 to be paid by April 30, 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment