Robinson v. Realm Energy International Corporation
The respondents demonstrated prejudice because the appellants hold assets only in foreign jurisdictions that will not permit enforcement of a B.C. judgment while an appeal is pending, effectively providing a de facto stay; balancing that prejudice against the merits of the appeal and the appellants' ability to continue the appeal, the court ordered security in the amount of the judgment and stayed the appeal until security was posted, while rejecting a guillotine dismissal order under s.10(2)(b).
- Citation
- 2016 BCCA 298
- Parties
- Respondent (plaintiff): Patrick Robinson; Respondent (plaintiff): P. Leigh Sauder; Appellant (defendant): Realm Energy International Corporation; Appellant (defendant): 0921644 B.C. Ltd. (amalgamated to San Leon Canada Limited); Appellant (defendant): San Leon Energy PLC; Respondent (defendant): Jay Sujir
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Trial Judgment and Stay Pending Posting of Security
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: security ordered and appeal stayed until security posted; applicants may apply to dismiss the appeal as abandoned if security not posted by the deadline.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Judgment, Stay of Execution, Enforcement Against Foreign Assets, Share Appraisal, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Robinson
Respondent (plaintiff)
P. Leigh Sauder
Respondent (plaintiff)
Realm Energy International Corporation
Appellant (defendant)
0921644 B.C. Ltd. (amalgamated to San Leon Canada Limited)
Appellant (defendant)
San Leon Energy PLC
Appellant (defendant)
Jay Sujir
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Security for Trial Judgment and Stay Pending Posting of Security
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for the trial judgment and costs should be ordered under s.10(2)(b)
- 2 Whether respondents will suffer prejudice because appellants have no exigible assets in British Columbia and assets are in jurisdictions that prevent execution pending appeal
- 3 Whether the appeal should be stayed until security is posted
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents demonstrated prejudice because the appellants hold assets only in foreign jurisdictions that will not permit enforcement of a B.C. judgment while an appeal is pending, effectively providing a de facto stay; balancing that prejudice against the merits of the appeal and the appellants' ability to continue the appeal, the court ordered security in the amount of the judgment and stayed the appeal until security was posted, while rejecting a guillotine dismissal order under s.10(2)(b).
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: security ordered and appeal stayed until security posted; applicants may apply to dismiss the appeal as abandoned if security not posted by the deadline.
Orders
- Respondents to post security in the total amount of CAD 2,931,789.34
- The appeal is stayed until security is posted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment