R. v. Seymour
Court held that particularly onerous pre-trial conditions (near-constant solitary confinement and assaults) justified enhanced credit at 1.5-to-1 for the period Aug 9, 2010 to Apr 11, 2011 (after adjusting for prior credits); found detention after June 19, 2011 fell under s.524(8) and was ineligible for enhanced...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2011 BCSC 1682
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Corey Wade Seymour
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Hearing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on firearm-related counts; conditional judicial stay on Count 2 (s.91(1)); sentences imposed with pre-trial credit applied.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Calculation, Credit for Pre Trial Custody (s.719), Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Kienapple Principle (subsidiary Charges), Forfeiture, DNA Order, Weapons Prohibition, Victim Surcharge Waiver
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Corey Wade Seymour
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Hearing (oral Reasons for Sentence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether enhanced credit (1.5:1) for pre-trial custody is justified
- 2 Application of s.524(8) to periods of detention and its effect on enhanced credit eligibility
- 3 Appropriate fit sentence for discharging a firearm with intent to endanger life (s.244(1)) and related firearms offences (ss.95(1),88(1)) after mandatory minimum amendments
Ratio Decidendi
Court held that particularly onerous pre-trial conditions (near-constant solitary confinement and assaults) justified enhanced credit at 1.5-to-1 for the period Aug 9, 2010 to Apr 11, 2011 (after adjusting for prior credits); found detention after June 19, 2011 fell under s.524(8) and was ineligible for enhanced credit; calculated total credit of 264 days (rounded) equating to nine months; imposed fit sentences of six years (s.244), four years (s.95(1)), and one year (s.88(1)) to be served concurrently, reduced by pre-trial credit to five years three months, three years three months, and three months respectively; directed conditional judicial stay on Count 2 (s.91(1)); ordered...
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on firearm-related counts; conditional judicial stay on Count 2 (s.91(1)); sentences imposed with pre-trial credit applied.
Orders
- Sentence: 6 years imprisonment for offence under s.244(1) (discharging firearm with intent) (declared fit sentence)
- Sentence imposed after credit: 5 years 3 months imprisonment for s.244(1) (concurrent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment