R. v. Dechamp
Court accepted the parties' joint recommendation and imposed three years federal imprisonment consecutive to time currently being served because the offence caused significant and lasting injury, the offender has a very serious violent history including a youth homicide conviction and multiple breaches, community measures had failed, and denunciation, deterrence and public protection required a substantial consecutive custodial term.
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 275
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Accused: Tyrell Peter Dechamp
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Aggravated Assault (s.268 Criminal Code) / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to three years' imprisonment in a federal penitentiary, to be served consecutive to time currently being served following parole revocation (resulting custody period approximated by court at about five years total).
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Aggravated Assault, Parole Revocation, Youth Record, Victim Impact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Crown
Tyrell Peter Dechamp
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Aggravated Assault (s.268 Criminal Code) / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper sentence for aggravated assault causing traumatic brain injury
- 2 Whether sentence should be consecutive to existing time/ parole revocation
- 3 Weight to give offender's serious prior youth conviction and breach history
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted the parties' joint recommendation and imposed three years federal imprisonment consecutive to time currently being served because the offence caused significant and lasting injury, the offender has a very serious violent history including a youth homicide conviction and multiple breaches, community measures had failed, and denunciation, deterrence and public protection required a substantial consecutive custodial term.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to three years' imprisonment in a federal penitentiary, to be served consecutive to time currently being served following parole revocation (resulting custody period approximated by court at about five years total).
Orders
- Accused sentenced to 3 years imprisonment to be served in a federal penitentiary, consecutive to time presently being served.
- Court accepted the joint recommendation of Crown and Defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment