Keeler v. Shields
Master Baker reasonably exercised his discretion and was not clearly wrong in finding the defendant met the lower threshold of demonstrating a defence worthy of investigation based on his affidavit (alleging consent to entry, possible mistaken identity and denial of assault); accordingly the order setting aside the default judgment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- 2007 BCSC 1627
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Norman V. Keeler; Defendant/respondent: David Duncan Shields
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort (trespass, Assault and Battery) / Appeal From Master's Decision to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Default Judgment, Meritorious Defence, Miracle Feeds Test, Discretionary Relief
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman V. Keeler
Plaintiff/appellant
David Duncan Shields
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort (trespass, Assault and Battery) / Appeal From Master's Decision to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Master erred in finding defendant had a defence worthy of investigation
- 2 Whether defendant wilfully or deliberately failed to file a defence
- 3 Whether affidavit evidence was sufficient to demonstrate a meritorious defence
Ratio Decidendi
Master Baker reasonably exercised his discretion and was not clearly wrong in finding the defendant met the lower threshold of demonstrating a defence worthy of investigation based on his affidavit (alleging consent to entry, possible mistaken identity and denial of assault); accordingly the order setting aside the default judgment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of Master Baker setting aside the default judgment upheld
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment