Teplitsky Colson LLP v. Malamas

The motion to vary, amend or set aside the June 17, 2013 order is dismissed as having no merit; no oral hearing is granted; no response from respondents is required; and restrictions on further filings and communications by the moving party are imposed along with permission for respondents to take out the order without the moving party's approval.

Citation: 2014 ONCA 308
Parties: Applicants/respondents/respondents: Teplitsky Colson LLP; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Gary Caplan; Applicants/respondents/respondents: 2004782 Ontario Limited; Applicants/respondents/respondents: 717 Pape Inc.; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Peter L. Biro; Applicants/respondents/respondents: CGD Management Limited; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Crerar Property Corp.; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Danforth Properties Limited; Applicants/respondents/respondents: George Fouldis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Goodman and Carr; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Jonathan Lisus; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Mccarthy Tetrault LLP; Applicants/respondents/respondents: The Mutual Trust Company (now known as the Clarica Trust Company); Applicants/respondents/respondents: Raymond Raphael; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Raymond Raphael Professional Corporation; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Stewart J.L Robertson; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Nicholas Stanoulis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Donna Stanoulis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Christina Stanoulis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Gary Stanoulis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Thomas Stanoulis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Thomas M.T. Sutton; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Chris Tatsis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Panagiota Tatsis; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Tonu Toome; Applicants/respondents/respondents: Toome Laar & Bell; Applicants/respondents/respondents: City of Toronto; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: William Malamas (also known as Vasilios Malamas); Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Apollco Developments Ltd.; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Apollo Real Estate Limited; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Apollco Properties Limited; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Apollco Construction Ltd.; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Apollo Ltd.; Respondents/appellants/moving Parties: Pallas Properties Inc.
Court: Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction: Canada
Judgment Date: 22 April 2014
Procedural Posture: Collection / Motion to Set Aside Court Order (rule 59.06)
Outcome: Motion dismissed
Legal Topics: Setting Aside Order, Filing Restrictions, Appeal Procedure
Source Language: English

Civil Collection Appeal Setting Aside Order Filing Restrictions Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2