R. v. J.S.H.
Appeal allowed because there was no evidence establishing that an indecent assault formed part of the actus reus of the offence charged and the conviction was based on unrelated hearsay; therefore conviction under s.662 could not stand and conviction and sentence were quashed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 1993 NSCA 94
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: J. S. H.; Respondent/appellant: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Conviction; Appeal Allowed and Conviction Quashed
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Anal Intercourse (s.159), Included Offences (s.662), Hearsay, Actus Reus, Sufficiency of Evidence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J. S. H.
Appellant/respondent
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Conviction; Appeal Allowed and Conviction Quashed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was lawful and sufficient evidence to support conviction for an included offence
- 2 Whether evidence admitted as hearsay could establish the requisite actus reus
- 3 Whether s.662 permits conviction on evidence unrelated to the offence charged
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal allowed because there was no evidence establishing that an indecent assault formed part of the actus reus of the offence charged and the conviction was based on unrelated hearsay; therefore conviction under s.662 could not stand and conviction and sentence were quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed
Orders
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment