R. v. Archer

R. v. Archer

On the whole of the evidence the trial judge accepted the complainant's account, rejected the accused's account as not credible, found the accused failed to take reasonable steps to ascertain consent and was reckless or wilfully blind; therefore s.273.2 precluded the honest but mistaken belief defence and the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed sexual assault on the hilltop and in the car; the contemporaneous text message was excluded as its limited probative value was outweighed by prejudicial effect.

Citation
2021 NSPC 17
Parties
Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: John Archer
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault (s.271 Criminal Code) / Trial — Judgment/decision
Outcome
Guilty
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Consent, Honest But Mistaken Belief in Communicated Consent, Reasonable Steps to Ascertain Consent (s.273.2), Admissibility of Prior Statements / Res Gestae, Credibility Assessment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Prosecution

John Archer

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Assault (s.271 Criminal Code) / Trial — Judgment/decision

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code
  2. 2 Whether the complainant voluntarily consented to the sexual activity
  3. 3 Whether the defence of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent had an air of reality

Ratio Decidendi

On the whole of the evidence the trial judge accepted the complainant's account, rejected the accused's account as not credible, found the accused failed to take reasonable steps to ascertain consent and was reckless or wilfully blind; therefore s.273.2 precluded the honest but mistaken belief defence and the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed sexual assault on the hilltop and in the car; the contemporaneous text message was excluded as its limited probative value was outweighed by prejudicial effect.

Court Disposition

Guilty

Orders

  • Accused found guilty of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code
  • Evidence of the complainant's contemporaneous text message excluded as having limited probative value outweighed by prejudicial effect