R. v. Parker
The court found on the balance of probabilities that Mr. Parker posed little risk of reoffending and that there was a marked and serious imbalance between the objective of s.490.012 and the significant liberty infringements SOIRA would impose in his individual circumstances; accordingly a tailored s.24(1) remedy exempted him from the suspension of invalidity so s.490.012 does not apply to him. On sentencing the court imposed a suspended sentence and two-year probation with conditions.
- Citation
- 2023 NSPC 38
- Parties
- Crown: His Majesty the King; Accused: Stuart Parker
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Decision on Sentencing and Charter S.24(1) Remedy Re: SOIRA Exemption
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty after trial; sentence imposed — suspended sentence and two-year probation with ancillary conditions; granted s.24(1) remedial exemption so s.490.012 SOIRA shall not apply to Mr. Parker
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Conditional Discharge, SOIRA Registration, Section 7 Charter Overbreadth, Section 24(1) Remedial Relief, Risk Assessment, Denunciation and Deterrence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King
Crown
Stuart Parker
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Decision on Sentencing and Charter S.24(1) Remedy Re: SOIRA Exemption
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a conditional discharge is appropriate under s.730 of the Criminal Code
- 2 Whether the accused meets the high standard of gross disproportionality to be exempted from the suspension of invalidity of s.490.012 under s.24(1) of the Charter
- 3 Whether mandatory SOIRA registration is grossly disproportionate to the legislative objective in the accused's individual circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that Mr. Parker posed little risk of reoffending and that there was a marked and serious imbalance between the objective of s.490.012 and the significant liberty infringements SOIRA would impose in his individual circumstances; accordingly a tailored s.24(1) remedy exempted him from the suspension of invalidity so s.490.012 does not apply to him. On sentencing the court imposed a suspended sentence and two-year probation with conditions.
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty after trial; sentence imposed — suspended sentence and two-year probation with ancillary conditions; granted s.24(1) remedial exemption so s.490.012 SOIRA shall not apply to Mr. Parker
Orders
- Impose suspended sentence
- Probation for two years with conditions: report to Probation Services within two business days and thereafter as directed; no contact directly or indirectly with C.W.; remain at least 50 metres from any residence or workplace of C.W.; undergo assessment and counselling as directed by Probation Services
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment