R. v. McCallum

R. v. McCallum

The judge accepted the complainant's core account as reliable and found it corroborated by medical injuries, the 9‑1‑1 call recordings and officer/nurse observations; the accused's denial and defence challenges did not raise a reasonable doubt, therefore the Crown proved sexual assault and assault beyond a reasonable doubt.

Citation
2009 BCSC 1919
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Robert Laurie McCallum
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial — Judgment (conviction)
Outcome
Convicted on Count 1 (sexual assault) and Count 2 (assault)
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Consent, Credibility Assessment, Medical Corroboration, 911 Recordings
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Assault Evidence Sexual Assault Consent Credibility Assessment Medical Corroboration +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Robert Laurie McCallum

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial — Judgment (conviction)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed sexual assault
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed assault
  3. 3 Assessment of credibility between complainant and accused

Ratio Decidendi

The judge accepted the complainant's core account as reliable and found it corroborated by medical injuries, the 9‑1‑1 call recordings and officer/nurse observations; the accused's denial and defence challenges did not raise a reasonable doubt, therefore the Crown proved sexual assault and assault beyond a reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Convicted on Count 1 (sexual assault) and Count 2 (assault)

Orders

  • Findings of guilty on Count 1 (sexual assault) and Count 2 (assault)