R. v. Aulakh

R. v. Aulakh

Medical evidence of a fresh, forceful Y‑shaped vaginal laceration consistent with forced penetration together with taxi GPS/computer and camera evidence establishing secluded stops and that no one else had access to the complainant during those stops proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a sexual assault occurred in Yellow Cab 195 and that the accused, the driver, was the assailant; circumstantial evidence left no reasonable innocent inference.

Citation
2010 BCSC 1026
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Baljit Singh Aulakh; Complainant: K.R.
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
29 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial — Judgment (conviction)
Outcome
Guilty on Count 1 (sexual assault). Counts 2 and 3 admitted by guilty plea; Count 4 stayed by Crown.
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Identification Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, Medical Evidence, Surveillance (in‑vehicle Camera), GPS Evidence, Onus of Proof
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Evidence Forensic and Surveillance Evidence Sexual Assault Identification Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Medical Evidence +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Baljit Singh Aulakh

Accused

K.R.

Complainant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial — Judgment (conviction)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a sexual assault occurred
  2. 2 Whether the accused was the assailant
  3. 3 Reliability of complainant's testimony given intoxication

Ratio Decidendi

Medical evidence of a fresh, forceful Y‑shaped vaginal laceration consistent with forced penetration together with taxi GPS/computer and camera evidence establishing secluded stops and that no one else had access to the complainant during those stops proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a sexual assault occurred in Yellow Cab 195 and that the accused, the driver, was the assailant; circumstantial evidence left no reasonable innocent inference.

Court Disposition

Guilty on Count 1 (sexual assault). Counts 2 and 3 admitted by guilty plea; Count 4 stayed by Crown.

Orders

  • Conviction entered on Count 1 (sexual assault).
  • Convictions entered on Counts 2 and 3 (theft of debit card and theft of money) by guilty plea.