R. v. Reis
Trial judge accepted the complainant's account as credible, rejected the defence and defence witnesses as not credible, found weapons and medical/physical evidence corroborative, and concluded the Crown proved both the actus reus and mens rea of sexual assault with a weapon and unlawful confinement beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- 2010 BCSC 1775
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Victor Joseph Reis; Complainant: I.C.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault and Unlawful Confinement / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant found guilty on Count 1 (sexual assault with a weapon) and Count 2 (unlawful confinement).
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Consent, Use of Weapon, Unlawful Confinement, Credibility Assessment, Medical Forensic Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Victor Joseph Reis
Accused
I.C.
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault and Unlawful Confinement / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sexual intercourse occurred without consent
- 2 Whether the accused was aware of the complainant's lack of consent (mens rea)
- 3 Whether the complainant was unlawfully confined
Ratio Decidendi
Trial judge accepted the complainant's account as credible, rejected the defence and defence witnesses as not credible, found weapons and medical/physical evidence corroborative, and concluded the Crown proved both the actus reus and mens rea of sexual assault with a weapon and unlawful confinement beyond a reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Defendant found guilty on Count 1 (sexual assault with a weapon) and Count 2 (unlawful confinement).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment