R. v. S.K.
The accused was convicted as a party to numerous sexual assaults because the Crown proved she knew of ongoing abuse, took no steps to protect her child, and that omission aided and encouraged the perpetrator; however the Crown failed to prove the requisite permanent endangerment to health under s.215(2)(a), so the failure‑to‑provide necessaries charge was not proven.
- Citation
- 2017 BCSC 366
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: S.K.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial Oral Reasons for Judgment (conviction/acquittal)
- Outcome
- Convicted as party to numerous sexual assaults; acquitted on charge of failing to provide necessaries.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Failure to Provide Necessaries, Accessorial Liability, Publication Ban
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
S.K.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Oral Reasons for Judgment (conviction/acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was a party to ongoing sexual assaults on her child by omission
- 2 Whether the Crown proved failure to provide necessaries under s.215(2)(a) (permanent endangerment to health)
- 3 Reliability and sufficiency of accomplice (K.C.) evidence and corroboration
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was convicted as a party to numerous sexual assaults because the Crown proved she knew of ongoing abuse, took no steps to protect her child, and that omission aided and encouraged the perpetrator; however the Crown failed to prove the requisite permanent endangerment to health under s.215(2)(a), so the failure‑to‑provide necessaries charge was not proven.
Court Disposition
Convicted as party to numerous sexual assaults; acquitted on charge of failing to provide necessaries.
Orders
- Conviction entered: accused guilty as a party to sexual assaults of M.D. for period alleged in indictment.
- Acquittal entered on count alleging failure to provide necessaries (s.215(2)(a)).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment