R. v. England

R. v. England

The offence was a home invasion sexual assault involving penile and digital penetration of a former intimate partner in an occupied dwelling with violence, significant victim harm, and prior violent convictions; applicable sentencing range for this factual scenario is five to ten years; balancing aggravating factors (occupied dwelling, use of violence and threats, intimate partner, severe victim impact, prior violence) against mitigating factors (sobriety efforts, gaps in record, counselling, bail compliance) yields a custodial sentence of seven years on Count 2 and six months concurrent on Count 3; 95 days pre-sentence custody credited, resulting net overall sentence of six years, eight...

Citation
2022 BCSC 919
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Troy Lee England
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
24 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault, Break and Enter, Uttering Threats / Sentencing
Outcome
Accused convicted following trial and sentenced
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Break and Enter, Uttering Threats, Sentencing, Intoxication Defence, Ancillary Orders, Pre Sentence Custody Credit, Publication Ban
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Troy Lee England

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Assault, Break and Enter, Uttering Threats / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for break and enter with sexual assault involving penetration in occupied dwelling
  2. 2 Application of aggravating and mitigating factors including intimate partner status and victim impact
  3. 3 Treatment of intoxication defence after R. v. Brown

Ratio Decidendi

The offence was a home invasion sexual assault involving penile and digital penetration of a former intimate partner in an occupied dwelling with violence, significant victim harm, and prior violent convictions; applicable sentencing range for this factual scenario is five to ten years; balancing aggravating factors (occupied dwelling, use of violence and threats, intimate partner, severe victim impact, prior violence) against mitigating factors (sobriety efforts, gaps in record, counselling, bail compliance) yields a custodial sentence of seven years on Count 2 and six months concurrent on Count 3; 95 days pre-sentence custody credited, resulting net overall sentence of six years, eight...

Court Disposition

Accused convicted following trial and sentenced

Orders

  • Count 2: seven years imprisonment for break and enter and commit sexual assault (s.348(1)(b)); Count 3: six months imprisonment for uttering threats, to be served concurrently
  • Credit of 95 days pre-sentence custody applied to global sentence (s.719(3.1)), yielding net sentence of six years, eight months and 25 days