R. v. Hutchinson
Conditional sentence and suspension rejected; custodial sentence of 18 months imposed because offender premeditated condom sabotage, breached intimate trust, and general deterrence and denunciation require incarceration; DNA order and 20‑year SOIRA registration ordered; weapons prohibition denied; victim surcharge waived due to incarceration.
- Citation
- 2011 NSSC 462
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Craig Jaret Hutchinson
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to 18 months imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Condom Tampering, General Deterrence, Conditional Sentence, DNA Order, Sex Offender Registration, Victim Surcharge
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Craig Jaret Hutchinson
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a conditional sentence is appropriate
- 2 Appropriate length of custodial sentence for condom sabotage sexual assault
- 3 Aggravating and mitigating factors including breach of trust and premeditation
Ratio Decidendi
Conditional sentence and suspension rejected; custodial sentence of 18 months imposed because offender premeditated condom sabotage, breached intimate trust, and general deterrence and denunciation require incarceration; DNA order and 20‑year SOIRA registration ordered; weapons prohibition denied; victim surcharge waived due to incarceration.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to 18 months imprisonment
Orders
- 18 months imprisonment
- D.N.A. order pursuant to s.487.051 of the Criminal Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment