R. v. Khan
Although the trial judge found both complainant and accused to be believable, material reliability concerns (inconsistencies among witnesses, police notes, and effects of intoxication) together with accepted expert opinion on impairment created reasonable doubt on an essential element of s.271; therefore the accused was acquitted.
- Citation
- 2022 NSSC 223
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Dederick Eric Khan
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
- Outcome
- Acquittal of Dederick Eric Khan
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Consent, Intoxication and Memory, Credibility and Reliability, Expert Toxicology, Burden of Proof (w.(d.) Analysis)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecutor
Dederick Eric Khan
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused touched the complainant in a sexual manner
- 2 Whether the complainant consented
- 3 Whether intoxication and cannabis use undermined complainant's reliability and memory
Ratio Decidendi
Although the trial judge found both complainant and accused to be believable, material reliability concerns (inconsistencies among witnesses, police notes, and effects of intoxication) together with accepted expert opinion on impairment created reasonable doubt on an essential element of s.271; therefore the accused was acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquittal of Dederick Eric Khan
Orders
- Dederick Eric Khan is acquitted of the charge of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code.
- Publication ban pursuant to Criminal Code ss.486.4 and 486.5: no information identifying the complainant, victim or witness may be published, broadcast or transmitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment