R. v. D.M.
The judge accepted the complainant's testimony as credible, found the accused committed multiple non-consensual sexual touches in the context of a pervasive sexualized environment, concluded each touching was for a sexual purpose and that the accused was in a position of trust, and therefore convicted on sexual exploitation (s.153(1)(a)) and sexual assault (s.271).
- Citation
- 2020 BCSC 1389
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: D.M.; Complainant: L.M.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences / Trial Judgment (oral Reasons)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on Count 1 (sexual exploitation s.153(1)(a)) and Count 2 (sexual assault s.271)
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Exploitation S.153(1)(a), Sexual Assault S.271, Consent and Mens Rea, Credibility Assessment, Position of Trust, Section 43 Defence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
D.M.
Accused
L.M.
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences / Trial Judgment (oral Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused touched the complainant for a sexual purpose (s.153(1)(a))
- 2 Whether the accused committed sexual assault without consent (s.271)
- 3 Credibility and reliability of the complainant's evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge accepted the complainant's testimony as credible, found the accused committed multiple non-consensual sexual touches in the context of a pervasive sexualized environment, concluded each touching was for a sexual purpose and that the accused was in a position of trust, and therefore convicted on sexual exploitation (s.153(1)(a)) and sexual assault (s.271).
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on Count 1 (sexual exploitation s.153(1)(a)) and Count 2 (sexual assault s.271)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment