R. v. Reed
Applying Friesen and relevant sentencing principles the Court concluded that Reed's repeated sexual intercourse with a 15-year-old, possession of sexual images, continuous offending and extensive criminal record made him highly morally blameworthy; guilty plea and remorse mitigate but do not outweigh aggravating features; a fit sentence is 36 months for sexual interference plus 2 months consecutive for obstructing police (total 38 months), with pre-trial custody credit of 17 months at 1.5 (25.5 months) leaving 12.5 months to serve; mandatory ancillary orders (DNA, weapons prohibitions, SOIRA, no-contact) were imposed.
- Citation
- 2023 BCSC 595
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Richard Charles Reed
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences and Obstruction / Sentencing Following Guilty Pleas
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Interference, Resisting or Willfully Obstructing Police, Pre Sentence Custody Credit, Publication Ban, Ancillary Orders (dna, Weapons, Soira)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Richard Charles Reed
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences and Obstruction / Sentencing Following Guilty Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate custodial sentence for sexual interference with a 15-year-old post-Friesen
- 2 Whether and how to apply Friesen factors (age, duration, degree of physical interference, likelihood of reoffending)
- 3 Appropriate consecutive sentence for resisting/obstructing police
Ratio Decidendi
Applying Friesen and relevant sentencing principles the Court concluded that Reed's repeated sexual intercourse with a 15-year-old, possession of sexual images, continuous offending and extensive criminal record made him highly morally blameworthy; guilty plea and remorse mitigate but do not outweigh aggravating features; a fit sentence is 36 months for sexual interference plus 2 months consecutive for obstructing police (total 38 months), with pre-trial custody credit of 17 months at 1.5 (25.5 months) leaving 12.5 months to serve; mandatory ancillary orders (DNA, weapons prohibitions, SOIRA, no-contact) were imposed.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced
Orders
- 36 months jail on Count 2 (sexual interference)
- 2 months jail on Count 8 (resisting or willfully obstructing police) to be served consecutively, for a total sentence of 38 months jail
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment