R. v. G.H.E.
A conditional sentence was inappropriate because the offences were serious, involved very young and vulnerable victims, were committed by a parent in a position of trust over a prolonged period with repeated acts and significant impact on the primary victim; general deterrence and denunciation required actual incarceration; the appropriate sentence is 18 months imprisonment for the count involving the older daughter and 6 months imprisonment consecutive for the count involving the younger daughter; ancillary orders include DNA sample, lifetime registration under the Sexual Offender Information Registration Act and firearms prohibitions under s.109, and s.161 was not imposed.
- Citation
- 2017 NSSC 281
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: G.H.E.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to imprisonment: 18 months on count one and 6 months consecutive on count three; ancillary orders imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Interference, Sentencing, Conditional Sentence, Ancillary Orders, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
G.H.E.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for multiple counts of sexual interference of children by a parent
- 2 Whether a conditional sentence is appropriate given nature and gravity of offences
- 3 Whether consecutive sentences are appropriate and proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
A conditional sentence was inappropriate because the offences were serious, involved very young and vulnerable victims, were committed by a parent in a position of trust over a prolonged period with repeated acts and significant impact on the primary victim; general deterrence and denunciation required actual incarceration; the appropriate sentence is 18 months imprisonment for the count involving the older daughter and 6 months imprisonment consecutive for the count involving the younger daughter; ancillary orders include DNA sample, lifetime registration under the Sexual Offender Information Registration Act and firearms prohibitions under s.109, and s.161 was not imposed.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to imprisonment: 18 months on count one and 6 months consecutive on count three; ancillary orders imposed.
Orders
- Count one (sexual interference regarding older daughter): 18 months imprisonment.
- Count three (sexual interference regarding younger daughter): 6 months imprisonment to run consecutively.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment