R. v. APL
Offender convicted of sexual interference of a child under 16 and sexual interference of a dependent young person; the prolonged, frequent sexual abuse of a vulnerable 12-year-old by a person in a position of trust, combined with exploitation and threats, required a significant custodial sentence under s.718 principles and Friesen guidance; delay and offender background were mitigating but insufficient to avoid a lengthy term; result: six years for Count 2 and six months concurrent for Count 3, plus ancillary orders.
- Citation
- 2021 NSSC 238
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: APL
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted on Counts 2 and 3; Count 4 not guilty; Count 1 stayed; sentenced to six years imprisonment on Count 2 and six months imprisonment concurrent on Count 3.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Interference, Sexual Exploitation, Position of Trust, Sentencing Principles, Ancillary Orders, Publication Restrictions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecutor
APL
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate custodial sentence for sexual offences committed against a child
- 2 Application of Friesen to increase sentences for child sexual abuse
- 3 Weight of aggravating factors: abuse of trust, victim vulnerability, duration and frequency of abuse
Ratio Decidendi
Offender convicted of sexual interference of a child under 16 and sexual interference of a dependent young person; the prolonged, frequent sexual abuse of a vulnerable 12-year-old by a person in a position of trust, combined with exploitation and threats, required a significant custodial sentence under s.718 principles and Friesen guidance; delay and offender background were mitigating but insufficient to avoid a lengthy term; result: six years for Count 2 and six months concurrent for Count 3, plus ancillary orders.
Court Disposition
Convicted on Counts 2 and 3; Count 4 not guilty; Count 1 stayed; sentenced to six years imprisonment on Count 2 and six months imprisonment concurrent on Count 3.
Orders
- Six years imprisonment on Count 2 (sexual interference)
- Six months imprisonment on Count 3 (sexual interference of a dependent young person) to be served concurrently with Count 2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment