R. v. D.F.
On the whole of the evidence the Crown failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt because material inconsistencies, evidence placing some alleged incidents outside the indictment period, and the credible denial by the accused when weighed under the W.D. framework left a reasonable doubt; accordingly the accused is acquitted.
- Citation
- 2023 NSSC 295
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: DF
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
- Outcome
- Acquitted of all charges
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Interference (s.151), Sexual Exploitation (s.153), Incitement to Sexual Touching (s.152), Sexual Assault (s.271), Publication Bans (ss.486.4, 486.5), Credibility and Burden of Proof, Assessing Testimony of Accused (w.d. Principle)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
DF
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Crown proved charges beyond a reasonable doubt
- 2 Assessment of complainant credibility given multiple inconsistencies and delay
- 3 Application of W.D. principle when accused testifies
Ratio Decidendi
On the whole of the evidence the Crown failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt because material inconsistencies, evidence placing some alleged incidents outside the indictment period, and the credible denial by the accused when weighed under the W.D. framework left a reasonable doubt; accordingly the accused is acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquitted of all charges
Orders
- Accused acquitted on all counts
- Publication ban imposed under ss.486.4 and 486.5 of the Criminal Code (as noted in file)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment