Garberi v. Cité de Montréal

Garberi v. Cité de Montréal

The City had taken reasonable precautions (sanding, draining, active patrols) and the accident resulted from sudden weather-induced ice formation; therefore no negligence was proven and the City was not liable.

Citation
[1961] SCR 408
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Dame Maria Garberi; Defendant/respondent: Cité de Montréal
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 March 1961
Procedural Posture
Civil Torts / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (on Appeal From Court of Queen's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; action dismissed.
Legal Topics
Slip and Fall, Sidewalk Maintenance, Ice and Snow, Standard of Care, Municipal Duty
Source Language
English
Torts Municipal Liability Negligence Slip and Fall Sidewalk Maintenance Ice and Snow Standard of Care Municipal Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dame Maria Garberi

Plaintiff/appellant

Cité de Montréal

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Torts / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada (on Appeal From Court of Queen's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the City was negligent in maintaining the sidewalk
  2. 2 Whether the City's precautions were reasonable in light of changing weather conditions
  3. 3 Causation between municipal conduct and plaintiff's injury

Ratio Decidendi

The City had taken reasonable precautions (sanding, draining, active patrols) and the accident resulted from sudden weather-induced ice formation; therefore no negligence was proven and the City was not liable.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; action dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Action dismissed and City discharged from liability