Dessaulles v. Republic of Poland

Dessaulles v. Republic of Poland

The court held that the Republic of Poland enjoyed sovereign immunity from being sued in Canadian courts and that its initiation of disciplinary proceedings before the Bar of Montreal did not constitute a waiver of that immunity; therefore the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction and the action (against the Republic and the mis‑en‑cause) must be dismissed.

Citation
[1944] SCR 275
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Casimir Dessaulles; Defendant/respondent: Republic of Poland; Mis En Cause/third Party: Bar of Montreal
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 June 1944
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Legal Fees and Accounting Against a Foreign Sovereign (international Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec (appeal From Superior Court)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; action dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
State Immunity, Waiver of Immunity, Jurisdictional Declinatory Exception, Solicitor's Fees and Accounting, Bar Disciplinary Proceedings, Third‑party/mis‑en‑cause Procedure
Source Language
English
International Law Private International Law Civil Procedure Administrative/professional Discipline State Immunity Waiver of Immunity Jurisdictional Declinatory Exception Solicitor's Fees and Accounting +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Casimir Dessaulles

Plaintiff/appellant

Republic of Poland

Defendant/respondent

Bar of Montreal

Mis En Cause/third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Legal Fees and Accounting Against a Foreign Sovereign (international Law) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec (appeal From Superior Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a sovereign state is immune from jurisdiction of Canadian courts
  2. 2 Whether disciplinary proceedings instigated by a foreign state before a bar council constitute a waiver or acceptance of Canadian jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether Canadian courts have jurisdiction to hear a claim for fees and an accounting against a foreign state

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Republic of Poland enjoyed sovereign immunity from being sued in Canadian courts and that its initiation of disciplinary proceedings before the Bar of Montreal did not constitute a waiver of that immunity; therefore the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction and the action (against the Republic and the mis‑en‑cause) must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; action dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Action against the Republic of Poland and the Bar of Montreal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.