TA4-16341
The panel found that although Albanian police were ineffective in the late 1990s, their investigative and prosecutorial response in spring 2002 (hospital investigation, photographic identification, arrest, guilty plea and two-year sentence) demonstrated adequate state protection; the claimant failed to rebut the presumption of state protection and did not re-engage or exhaust available state remedies after 2002, therefore his refugee claim fails.
- Citation
- TA4-16341
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent / State Representative: Refugee Protection Officer; Representing Minister: Minister's Counsel
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Negative Decision (oral Decision July 6, 2006; Written Reasons July 27, 2006)
- Outcome
- Claim for refugee protection rejected
- Legal Topics
- State Protection, Internal Protection Alternative, Credibility, Risk Assessment, Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Refugee Protection Officer
Respondent / State Representative
Minister's Counsel
Representing Minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Negative Decision (oral Decision July 6, 2006; Written Reasons July 27, 2006)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the presumption of state protection in Albania has been rebutted
- 2 Whether Albania provided adequate protection after 2002 to defeat the claimant's fear
- 3 Whether the claimant exhausted local remedies or reasonably failed to do so
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that although Albanian police were ineffective in the late 1990s, their investigative and prosecutorial response in spring 2002 (hospital investigation, photographic identification, arrest, guilty plea and two-year sentence) demonstrated adequate state protection; the claimant failed to rebut the presumption of state protection and did not re-engage or exhaust available state remedies after 2002, therefore his refugee claim fails.
Court Disposition
Claim for refugee protection rejected
Orders
- Claim for refugee protection rejected pursuant to Sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment