TA4-04277

TA4-04277

The claimant failed to rebut the presumption that Guyana can and will provide adequate protection; documentary and testimonial evidence showed police response and government measures, therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Citation
TA4-04277
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
24 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under IRPA / Hearing and Determination (decision)
Outcome
Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
State Protection, Gender Based Violence, Criminal Violence, Convention Refugee Status
Source Language
English
Immigration Refugee Law Human Rights State Protection Gender Based Violence Criminal Violence Convention Refugee Status

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim Under IRPA / Hearing and Determination (decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether adequate state protection is available on return to Guyana
  2. 2 Whether claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee
  3. 3 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to rebut the presumption that Guyana can and will provide adequate protection; documentary and testimonial evidence showed police response and government measures, therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection