Ryan v. Sun Life Assurance Company
The Court held the clause was effective as backdated and applies; the insurer’s net recovery is limited to the portion of the settlement fairly attributable to past income loss and to loss of future earning capacity (interest and costs included), and the insurer cannot claim reimbursement for damages unrelated to income loss nor for benefits that accrue after the date the insured received the recovery.
- Citation
- 2005 NSCA 12
- Parties
- Appellant; Respondent by Cross Appeal: Leslie Susan Ryan; Respondent; Appellant by Cross Appeal: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Subrogation Clauses, Reimbursement and Set Off, Effective Date of Policy Amendments, Allocation of Settlement Proceeds, Future Benefits Entitlement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leslie Susan Ryan
Appellant; Respondent by Cross Appeal
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Respondent; Appellant by Cross Appeal
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What standard of review applies?
- 2 Does the subrogation clause apply despite being agreed after the accident?
- 3 Is the insurer entitled to reimbursement from the whole settlement or only amounts attributable to income loss?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the clause was effective as backdated and applies; the insurer’s net recovery is limited to the portion of the settlement fairly attributable to past income loss and to loss of future earning capacity (interest and costs included), and the insurer cannot claim reimbursement for damages unrelated to income loss nor for benefits that accrue after the date the insured received the recovery.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Cross-appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment