Iroquois Falls Community Credit Union Limited v. Co-Operators General Insurance Company
The court exercised its discretion to permit limited intervention by the fourth parties because they had a direct interest in upholding the trial judge's express limitation that the summary judgment bind only the respondent and appellants, and because intervention could be structured (no record augmentation, limited factum length, constrained oral argument) to avoid prejudice or delay; accordingly intervenors were added on specified conditions.
- Citation
- 2008 ONCA 318
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): Iroquois Falls Community Credit Union Limited (by its Liquidator, The Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario); Defendant (appellant): Co-Operators General Insurance Company; Defendant (appellant) and Fifth Party: CUMIS General Insurance Company; Third Party: Ruth E. Parisi; Third Party: Ross, Pope & Company; Fourth Party: Donna Simmons; Fourth Party: Aline LePage; Fourth Party: Lana Tremblay; Fourth Party: Beverly Devine; Fourth Party: Jackie Delaurier; Fourth Party: John Moon; Fourth Party: Ralph Wilkins; Fourth Party: Larry Porter; Fourth Party: Frank Lachance; Fourth Party: Ron Trottier; Fourth Party: Raymond Martineau; Fourth Party: Sergio Festarini; Fourth Party: Gerald Poirier; Fourth Party: Edward Fleming; Fourth Party: Credit Union Central of Ontario Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Collection (civil Insurance Dispute) / Appeal — Motion to Intervene Following Summary Judgment Motion
- Outcome
- Motion to intervene granted in part; four fourth parties added as intervenors on limited terms; no order for costs of the motion
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Intervention, Credibility Findings, Binding Effect of Judgments, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iroquois Falls Community Credit Union Limited (by its Liquidator, The Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario)
Plaintiff (respondent)
Co-Operators General Insurance Company
Defendant (appellant)
CUMIS General Insurance Company
Defendant (appellant) and Fifth Party
Ruth E. Parisi
Third Party
Ross, Pope & Company
Third Party
Donna Simmons
Fourth Party
Aline LePage
Fourth Party
Lana Tremblay
Fourth Party
Beverly Devine
Fourth Party
Jackie Delaurier
Fourth Party
John Moon
Fourth Party
Ralph Wilkins
Fourth Party
Larry Porter
Fourth Party
Frank Lachance
Fourth Party
Ron Trottier
Fourth Party
Raymond Martineau
Fourth Party
Sergio Festarini
Fourth Party
Gerald Poirier
Fourth Party
Edward Fleming
Fourth Party
Credit Union Central of Ontario Limited
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Collection (civil Insurance Dispute) / Appeal — Motion to Intervene Following Summary Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-participating fourth parties may intervene on appeal
- 2 Whether motion judge's adverse credibility/findings bind non-participating parties
- 3 Whether intervention would prejudice the respondent or delay the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to permit limited intervention by the fourth parties because they had a direct interest in upholding the trial judge's express limitation that the summary judgment bind only the respondent and appellants, and because intervention could be structured (no record augmentation, limited factum length, constrained oral argument) to avoid prejudice or delay; accordingly intervenors were added on specified conditions.
Court Disposition
Motion to intervene granted in part; four fourth parties added as intervenors on limited terms; no order for costs of the motion
Orders
- Moving parties added as intervenors on the following conditions: they take the record as it exists and shall not seek to augment the record
- They may serve and file a factum not to exceed 15 pages on or before May 7, 2008
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment